Peace

THE VEDIC APPROACH TO PEACE

Peace

AT THE INDIVIDUAL LEVEL

The Vedas, ancient sacred texts of Hinduism, offer several paths to achieving peace, both individually and collectively. Here are some key concepts:

At the individual level:

Ahimsa (Non-violence): The principle of non-violence is central to Vedic teachings. It encourages individuals to live in harmony with all living beings, promoting peace and reducing confict.

    Dharma (Righteousness): Following one’s dharma, or duty, is seen as a way to maintain social order and harmony. This includes ethical behaviour, truthfulness and justice.

    Meditation and Yoga: The Vedas emphasize the importance of meditation and yoga for inner peace. These practices calm the mind, reduce stress and foster a sense of unity with the universe.

    Prayers and Rituals: Regular prayers and rituals are believed to bring peace and prosperity. The Vedas contain numerous hymns and mantras that are recited to invoke peace and harmony.

    Social Harmony: The Vedas advocate for social harmony and understanding among different communities and nations. They emphasize the importance of coexistence, mutual respect and brotherhood.

    These principles collectively guide individuals and societies towards a peaceful and harmonious existence.

    Global Peace

    AT THE COLLECTIVE (PLANETARY) LEVEL

    The Vedic approach emphasizes holistic and spiritual methods to achieve peace. The Western approach often focusses on diplomatic, political and economic strategies.

    The Vedic Approach to Global Peace

    The Vedas do contain teachings that can be interpreted as guidance for achieving global peace and avoiding inter-state conflicts. Here are some key concepts:

    Universal Brotherhood (Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam): This phrase from the Maha Upanishad, often associated with Vedic teachings, means “the world is one family.” It promotes the idea of global unity and harmony, encouraging nations to see each other as part of a larger human family.

    Peaceful Coexistence: The Vedas emphasize the importance of living in harmony with others. This includes respecting different cultures, beliefs, and practices, which can help reduce conflicts between states.

    Dialogue and Diplomacy: The Vedas advocate for resolving disputes through dialogue and understanding rather than through violence. This principle can be applied to international relations to avoid conflicts and promote peace.

    Righteous Leadership (Rajadharma): The concept of Rajadharma, or the duty of rulers, stresses that leaders should govern with justice, fairness, and compassion. Ethical leadership is seen as crucial for maintaining peace and preventing conflicts.

    Sacrifices and Rituals for Peace: The Vedas include various rituals and sacrifices intended to bring peace and prosperity to the land. These rituals are symbolic of the collective effort needed to maintain harmony.

    These teachings, while ancient, offer timeless wisdom that can be applied to modern efforts for global peace and conflict resolution.

    Western Approach to Global Peace

    • International Diplomacy: Engaging in negotiations and treaties to resolve conflicts and promote cooperation.

    • Economic Development: Addressing poverty and inequality as root causes of conflict.

    • Peacebuilding Initiatives: Programs and policies aimed at rebuilding war-torn societies and preventing future conflicts.

    • Global Peace Index: Measuring and promoting peace through data-driven analysis and policy recommendations.

    Both approaches aim for global peace but differ in their methods and underlying philosophies. The Vedic approach is more spiritually oriented, while the Western approach is more pragmatic and policy-driven.

    Global Pressures and Risks

    PROSPECTS OF LASTING PEACE

    Global peace is the pre-requisite for a self-regulating market system, which requires ever-increasing global standards of living with ever-decreasing global natural resources.

    The terminal decree issued on life forms on Earth by the Thermodynamic perspective of life, underpinned by the Conservation of Energy and Entropy laws, do not bode well for lasting global peace. These man-made laws are based on matter-energy prescriptions for human development and radiating motion.

    Dependence on matter energy has been central to human development since the Western industrial revolution, but has led to significant disharmonies between man and nature:

    Fossil fuels (matter energy): While combustion has driven industrialisation and economic growth, it has also caused environmental degradation and climate change. Emissions contribute to air pollution and global warming, resulting in severe weather events at the collective (planetary) level and health problems at the individual level.

    Nuclear energy (matter energy): Fission carries risks such as potential accidents (e.g., Chernobyl, Fukushima) and the long-term challenge of radioactive waste management. It also provides a pretext for the development of destructive weapons, threatening nature, the art of the Divine.

    Sustainable or renewable energy: Despite efforts to transition to solar, wind, and hydroelectric power, these sources cannot fully mitigate the dire predictions of the Thermodynamic perspective of life, underpinned by current scientific thinking.

    Matter-energy prescriptions of energy for human development present the following global pressures and risks:

    1. Environmental degradation and its consequences (e.g; harmful emissions)
    2. Natural-resource depletion and its consequences (e.g; increased costs and resource rivalry)

    Both threaten life forms in different ways and either one can lead to inter-state conflicts in the following possible scenarios:

    1. How environmental degradation could lead to inter-state conflicts:

    Resource Scarcity: Environmental degradation can lead to the depletion of essential resources like water, arable land and forests.

    Economic stress: Reduced agricultural productivity and rising water and energy costs can put a strain on economies, leading to social unrest.

    Migration: Environmental refugees may cross borders in search of better living conditions, causing tensions with host countries.

    Competition: Neighbouring states may compete for increasingly scarce resources, leading to diplomatic conflicts and, in extreme cases, military confrontations.

    Climate change: extreme weather events and rising sea levels can aggravate existing tensions and create new conflicts over territory and resources.

     

    2. How natural-resource depletion could lead to inter-state conflicts:

    Resource competition: As resources such as oil, minerals and water become scarce, states may compete for control of these valuable assets.

    Economic dependence: Countries heavily dependent on specific resources can face economic instability if these resources are depleted, leading to conflicts with resource-rich neighbours.

    Territorial disputes: Disagreements over resource-rich areas can escalate into territorial disputes and, potentially, armed conflicts.

    Environmental damage: over-exploitation of resources can lead to environmental damage, which can further damage relations between states.

    Political instability: resource depletion can undermine political stability, making states more vulnerable to internal and external conflicts.

    The global-peace risk level is currently very high, as confirmed by the Doomsday Clock, compiled by scientists.

    Regarding environmental degradation, we identify seven critical issues:

    1. Irreversible climate-change tipping points have already been crossed, with more expected as threshold temperatures are passed.
    2. Forecasts for the 2050 global energy mix suggest a significant increase in renewables, but fossil fuels and nuclear energy will still play a major role.
    3. Matter energy (fossil fuels and nuclear) is predicted to remain a significant part of the global energy mix until at least 2050.
    4. Renewables are likely to grow but may face challenges in achieving timely and effective penetration of the energy mix before 2050.
    5. No currently known energy source can achieve net-negative emissions by 2050 without significant advancements and relying more on matter energy.
    6. No known energy resource can slow or reverse environmental degradation without increased reliance on matter energy.
    7. Fusion is not expected to be commercially viable before 2050, and it may face challenges in meeting the energy needs of the 21st century and equitable access.

    Regarding natural-resource depletion, we identify two main issues:

    1. Increased costs: The depletion of natural resources leads to higher extraction and production costs, impacting economies and consumers.
    2. Nations competing for resources: Countries engage in long-term strategic planning to secure resources for their prosperity, often at the expense of others. This competition can manifest overtly through confrontational strategies or covertly through economic measures.

    These factors suggest that the dire predictions of the Thermodynamic perspective of life, attributed to nature by science, cannot be overcome by human measures alone.

    This failure of human endeavours is evident in the inability of science and politics to reconcile the Growth-Energy Trilemma, where each nation must grow by trading off the global pressures and risks of Environmental Preservation, Energy Affordability, and Energy Security.

    Our thought experiments aim to reveal that nature has made ample provisions for humanity’s developmental needs. Incomplete scientific knowledge on energy has prompted human development on sub-optimal development paths since the industrial revolution. We aim to reveal that contrary to scientific claims, nature has ensured that the Earth is neither energy-limited nor entropic, making lasting global peace achievable.